Nick Carroll
I've spent 30 years building legal publishing infrastructure. I founded publish.law to help attorneys turn their cases, insights, and credentials into a digital presence they own, built for how clients, referral sources, and AI systems find lawyers today.
Notes
-
AI-driven search is sending real traffic and real inquiries, but most firms have no idea how much because they're not tracking it separately. This piece walks through what measurement actually looks like. If you're investing in content to get found in AI answers, you need a way to know if it's working.
-
If you've been treating SEO and 'AI optimization' as two separate projects, stop. Google has collapsed them into one system, so content that ranks well in search is the same content AI agents pull from. One solid strategy covers both, which means you don't need to reinvent anything, just make sure what you're publishing is genuinely useful to the people searching for your practice area.
-
Google is now applying spam enforcement to what gets surfaced in AI Overviews, not just traditional search results. If your firm's content cuts corners on quality or looks like it was written to game rankings, it's not just your blue links at risk. Getting cited in AI answers requires the same clean, authoritative content you'd want a judge to read.
-
As AI reshapes how people find attorneys, your social presence is starting to function as a trust signal, not just a marketing channel. This piece lays out practical ways to stay visible across platforms when traditional search results aren't the whole story anymore.
-
“One way they do that is by telling clients when they don’t have the right solution for them and helping them find another lawyer who does. Or telling the client why he doesn’t need a certain type of service he’s asked about, and know that you will contact them if and when that changes.”
-
Moz lays out a simple framework for structuring your content so AI agents can find it, understand it, and cite it. If you want your practice-area expertise showing up in AI answers, this is the kind of structural thinking that gets you there. It's practical, not theoretical.
-
If AI defines your firm from its homepage, ask the harder question: what is it using to define you?
LawLytics calls the homepage an "entity anchor," the snapshot a machine uses to know who you are and what you do. But you're not your firm. Your individual anchor is probably LinkedIn or your firm bio. You don't own either, and both are limited for the job.
If machines decide who gets put forward, you need an anchor of your own.
-
This exactly...
"Attorney-authored articles, detailed analyses, FAQs based on real client questions and content demonstrating authentic, practical legal experience benefitted from the update."
Attorneys need to put real effort into making sure their real-life experiences and reputation translate into online authority and visibility. It's not magic. But, it does take effort. -
You should consider signing up for a free publish.law site today just to use the notes feature. It combines the ease of a LinkedIn comment with the reach and visibility of a long-from blog post.
-
Perplexity is the only mainstream ai platform I don't currently pay for. Apparently that's about to change. I'm not a lawyer, but the Midpage/Perplexity integration looks really interesting...
Subscribe to Nick Carroll
Get new posts delivered to your inbox.